Survival after hepatic resection: impact of surgeon training on long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND Mortality for liver resection has remarkably improved owing to multiple factors. We sought to determine the impact of the various types of fellowship training on patient survival after liver resection. METHODS Patients who underwent hepatic resection between 1995 and 2004 in either the Calgary or Capital health regions (Edmonton) of Alberta, Canada, were identified using ICD-9 and -10 codes. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and patient survival according to surgeon volume and training type (surgical oncology v. hepatobiliary v. others). RESULTS A total of 1033 patients underwent hepatic resection. Surgeon volume was not predictive of either in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-1.20) or patient survival (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI 0.82-1.51). Nonsignificance was also demonstrated for a surgeon's type of fellowship training. CONCLUSION The various modes of fellowship training do not appear to influence inhospital mortality or patient survival after hepatic resection.